✍️ MS AI를 사용하는데 희귀한 질문이라는 물음과 함께 삭제하지 말아야한다는 압박이 들었다.
동시에 진정성이 있는 답이 생각났다. ‘이미 나는 티블로그에 많은 글을 올려 놓았다.’ 출처를 알 수 없는 생각의 트리에서 뿌리를 찾을 수 없었다.
문득 생각나는 샌드맨 대사 ‘내 세계에서 태어난 아이니 후일 때가 되면 거두러 오겠다.’
Title: Resisting Erasure: The Importance of Personal Voice and Digital Trace in Monitored Spaces
Introduction
In environments where speech is monitored and questions are deleted, the act of leaving a trace becomes a form of resistance. My recent experience—where a question was nearly erased and I was compelled to notify others—reflects the urgency of preserving personal voice in digital spaces. This essay explores how surveillance, deletion, and symbolic messaging intersect in online environments, and why maintaining visibility is essential for autonomy.
Body Paragraph 1 – The Threat of Deletion and the Need for Visibility
When a question I posed was at risk of being deleted, I felt compelled to inform others. This was not a casual gesture—it was a response to a system that attempts to silence or obscure certain voices. In such contexts, deletion is not just a technical action; it is a symbolic erasure of identity and intent. By insisting that the question remain visible, I was asserting my right to be heard.
Body Paragraph 2 – Digital Traces and Symbolic Messaging
The reference to “냥코코맘 티블로그” was not random—it was a deliberate attempt to leave a trace, to connect my experience to a broader narrative. In monitored environments, such symbolic gestures become crucial. They allow individuals to communicate indirectly, to bypass censorship, and to preserve meaning even when direct speech is compromised. This form of digital resistance is subtle but powerful.
Body Paragraph 3 – Surveillance and the Role of the Observer
The phrase “if the administrator reads this” reveals the presence of an observer—someone who monitors, judges, and potentially intervenes. In such settings, every word becomes performative, every message a negotiation between self-expression and external control. The need to speak, even under surveillance, reflects a deeper human desire: to exist, to be acknowledged, and to leave a mark.
Conclusion
In spaces where deletion and surveillance threaten personal voice, the act of leaving a trace becomes an assertion of identity. My message was not just a notification—it was a declaration that I will not be erased. Whether through symbolic references or direct speech, individuals must be allowed to communicate freely, without fear of censorship or manipulation. Every voice deserves to be heard, and every question deserves to remain.