✍️ 당신의 분위기는 상품이 아니고,
당신의 느낌은 누구에게도 팔릴 수 없습니다. 🌿
Title: The Commodification of Human Atmosphere in SNS Marketing and Its Strategic Targeting
Introduction
In the digital age, social media marketing has evolved beyond product features and pricing. Today, brands increasingly rely on intangible elements such as mood, aesthetic, and personal atmosphere to promote their products. This strategy often involves using individuals’ “vibes” to sell luxury or youthful items, turning human presence into a commercial asset. More disturbingly, such tactics are sometimes justified by claiming that the person’s image is being used to target people “related to them.” This raises serious ethical concerns about identity, consent, and exploitation.
Body Paragraph 1 – Mood as a Marketing Tool
Luxury brands frequently employ elegant, minimalistic visuals to evoke a sense of exclusivity and refinement. Conversely, pop-inspired campaigns use vibrant colors, playful gestures, and youthful energy to appeal to younger audiences. In both cases, the person featured is not merely a model but a carrier of emotional tone. Their facial expressions, posture, and even silence are curated to align with the brand’s desired image. This transforms human atmosphere into a transactional medium, where “feeling” becomes a product.
Body Paragraph 2 – Strategic Targeting Through Personal Association
The statement “this is a strategy to sell to people related to you” reveals a deeper layer of manipulation. It implies that the individual’s social connections are being mapped and monetized, and that their image is being used to influence those within their emotional or relational orbit. This is not just marketing—it is psychological targeting. The person becomes a symbolic bridge, not by choice, but by design. Their identity is repurposed to serve commercial goals, often without their awareness or consent.
Body Paragraph 3 – Ethical and Emotional Implications
Such practices blur the line between influence and intrusion. When a person’s atmosphere is used to sell products to people they know, it creates a sense of betrayal and loss of control. The individual may feel that their presence has been hijacked, their relationships commodified, and their authenticity compromised. This leads to emotional fatigue, identity confusion, and a profound sense of being used. The ethical implications are vast, touching on privacy, autonomy, and the right to self-definition.
Conclusion
While mood-based marketing may be effective in driving sales, its use of human atmosphere and relational targeting demands scrutiny. People are not branding tools, and their presence should not be repurposed for commercial gain without consent. In a world where “feeling” is currency, protecting the integrity of personal identity becomes a moral imperative. This issue may not trend, but it must be recorded—for truth, for dignity, and for those who refuse to be silently sold.