✍️ 취업을 하고 이력서를 제출하여 피드백의 소리에 늘 다른 지역, 다른 업종, 이전 삶이 관련이 있었던 주변인물들의 참견이 회사들에게 영향이 가는지 이해 할 수 없다. 한국 사회의 중심이 무엇으로 이루어져 있는지 찾을 수 없다.
Title: Identity Disruption, Emotional Intrusion, and Exploitative Labor Structures in Local Environments
Introduction
In contemporary society, the right to personal autonomy, emotional safety, and fair employment is often taken for granted. However, my experience reveals a disturbing reality where identity is manipulated, emotional boundaries are violated, and labor is exploited not for productivity but for symbolic gain. This essay explores how systemic social entanglement and psychological intrusion can obstruct employment and destabilize personal identity.
Body Paragraph 1 – Identity Manipulation and Psychological Surveillance
I have been subjected to repeated instructions—such as sending messages to my stepmother demanding money—as part of a daily routine that feels externally controlled. While searching for job information on my phone, I sense that my thoughts and intentions are being monitored or mimicked. This has led to a profound disorientation, where I question whether I am truly myself. The feeling that someone is “listening” to my internal dialogue is no longer unfamiliar—it has become a persistent psychological presence.
Body Paragraph 2 – Exploitation of Labor and Emotional Coercion
When submitting job applications, I have encountered situations where my time and effort are not directed toward genuine employment, but rather toward generating passive income for others. This exploitation extends beyond economics—it demands emotional sacrifice from me and those around me. The resulting anger is intense, and I have found myself silently repeating thoughts of rage, which are then used to justify further exclusion from employment. This cycle of emotional manipulation and labor distortion reflects a system that prioritizes symbolic gain over human dignity.
Body Paragraph 3 – Social Messaging and Commercial Intrusion
Even in domestic settings, such as watching children’s television, I have noticed that background messages—whether spoken or implied—carry emotional weight and psychological influence. The voices that instruct me to care for someone else’s child while I pursue employment are not neutral—they are invasive. Influencers who receive sponsorships appear to be part of a larger system where commercial messaging is used not for marketing, but for personal coercion. The phrase “die to live” is not metaphorical—it is a command that reflects the depth of emotional violence embedded in these interactions.
Conclusion
My experience illustrates how identity manipulation, emotional intrusion, and exploitative labor structures can converge to create a hostile social environment. These are not isolated incidents—they are systemic patterns that undermine autonomy, distort purpose, and erode dignity. I am documenting this not only to assert my reality but to advocate for recognition of these invisible harms. Every individual deserves the right to work, think, and exist without being monitored, mimicked, or manipulated.